When Merck’s marketing-to-governments arm marched forward to seek state and local changes of law — changes that would require vaccination of female children against HPV — with products like Merck’s Gardasil®, it set in motion an occasionally repugnant political and xenophobic process — per EcoChildsPlay:
. . . .Seventeen-year-old Simone Davis has been applying for citizenship for almost 10 years. When she was 3, she was abandoned and then adopted by her paternal grandmother, who married an American. The family moved to Port St. Joe, Fla.
Now, because she refuses to get the HPV vaccine, she may be sent back to England. That’s because Gardasil is among the required vaccines for citizenship. This vaccine is not mandated for [US Citizen] American girls [in Florida], though different [States] have their own laws. . . .
The problem is that politicians actually write the laws, and do stupid things — things like exempting citizens from their application. I am fairly certain such a law wouldn’t survive Supreme Court scrutiny (on “equal protection“, or “free exercise” grounds), but for now, it stands — until the inevitable ACLU challenge wends its way through the courts.
Note also that if this girl lived in California, Iowa, Colorado or Illinois, she would not be subject to deportation for refusing the vaccine (but in Texas she might). None of that makes any sense (there is no “rational relationship” — in Supreme Court speak — between the law’s supposed aim of stopping a sexually-transmitted-disease, and wholesale exempting girls born as US citizens from getting the vaccine), as underneath this law is the whiff of something that suggests non-citizens are dirty, promiscuous or disease ridden.
And, all in the name of selling more Gardasil®. It is a good vaccine, if appropriately deployed, voluntarily. Mounting it as the business-end of a deportation order is another matter.
Perhaps Meck should intervene, and express its opposition to such an inhumane application of a policy Merck itself set in motion.
Just a thought.